
A debt to Albert Ellis
When people tell the story of a difficult day, they often move straight from what happened to how they felt: “My supervisor questioned me, and it made me anxious.” Albert Ellis asked us to pause in the middle. What did the person believe the question meant? Did they predict humiliation, demand a perfect answer, or conclude that one uncertain moment proved incompetence? His ABC model gives us a practical way to investigate that middle step rather than treating the emotional consequence as an automatic verdict about the event.
Ellis developed rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) in the 1950s. His contribution helped establish a form of psychotherapy that takes beliefs seriously as something we can identify, question, and revise. He did more than give us a memorable alphabet. He made room for a question that can be asked in a classroom, a counseling office, or a private moment of reflection: What did I tell myself about what happened? (Albert Ellis Institute, n.d.-a, n.d.-b).
That question does not deny adversity. A rejection, illness, loss, unfair treatment, or frightening experience can be real and consequential. Nor does it mean a person chooses every feeling. The model suggests that the beliefs we bring to an event help shape our emotional and behavioral responses. Some beliefs are flexible and supported by the facts; others contain rigid demands or sweeping conclusions. Examining those beliefs can create another way to respond (Albert Ellis Institute, n.d.-b).
The language of B
I pay particular attention to the words should, ought, must, have to, and need. They may reveal a demand beneath a feeling: “I must answer perfectly”; “They should never question me”; “I need everyone to approve.” When the demand is absolute, the mind may treat an unwanted event as intolerable or as proof of personal worthlessness. Ellis’s work invites us to test that demand: Where is the evidence? Is the conclusion logical? Does it help me respond?
The words themselves are not the problem. “I need water” can describe a bodily necessity. “I have to submit this by Friday” may describe a real deadline. “I should check my work” can express a sensible preference. We learn about B by asking what the word means in context and whether a preference has quietly become a rule that reality is forbidden to break.
On these whiteboards, E is called emotional evolution: the movement from an emotion that leaves us frozen toward one that helps us act. Ellis more commonly used E for an effective new belief or philosophy. The two ideas belong together. A more accurate and flexible belief may allow someone to feel concerned rather than panicked, disappointed rather than ashamed, or frustrated without concluding that they are a failure. The goal is not to force a cheerful feeling. It is to respond to what is real with greater freedom.
That is the homage I want to offer Ellis. His model respects our capacity to ask better questions of our own thoughts. It gives us a way to remain curious about emotion without treating the emotion as an enemy—and to correct an unhelpful belief without condemning the person who held it.
Understanding quiz: 15 questions
For readers ages 15 and older. Choose one answer for each question, then select “Check my answers.” The quiz stays on this page; it does not collect or save your responses. It is a learning exercise, not a clinical assessment.
Mastery: five applications
Write your response to each situation before opening the possible answer. These exercises ask you to separate observation from interpretation and apply the model with care. The sample responses are examples, not the only good answers.
1. A supervisor asks you to clarify an answer. You freeze and say, “She thinks I am incompetent.” Write A, B, and C separately.
Compare with one possible response
A: She asked for clarification. B: I interpret the question as proof she thinks I am incompetent; I may demand that I answer perfectly. C: I feel anxious and may freeze. The supervisor’s actual opinion has not been established.
2. A friend does not invite you to a gathering. You feel hurt. Identify one legitimate preference and one rigid demand that might occupy B.
Compare with one possible response
Preference: I would like to be included and can ask what happened. Demand: My friend must include me every time or I am unimportant. Feeling hurt does not itself prove the demand; a flexible belief may support sadness or disappointment without a global judgment.
3. Someone says, “I need water,” and later, “I need everyone to like me.” Explain why the same word deserves two different inquiries.
Compare with one possible response
Water can be a bodily necessity. Universal approval is generally a wish expressed as if it were necessary for worth or survival. Ask what “need” means in each context rather than labeling the word itself irrational.
4. You receive a critical comment on a project. Write two D questions, then a more accurate belief and a possible E emotion.
Compare with one possible response
D: What exactly did the comment say? Does one criticism prove the whole project or my worth is a failure? New belief: I prefer a positive review, and I can use a specific criticism to improve. Possible E: Concerned or disappointed, but able to respond.
5. A person says, “A causes C, so nothing I think can matter.” Explain the model without dismissing real adversity.
Compare with one possible response
The event can be genuinely painful and affect the person. The ABC model invites us to examine the beliefs and meanings that help shape the emotional consequence; it does not blame someone for suffering or promise that changing a thought removes every effect of adversity.
References
Albert Ellis Institute. (n.d.-a). About Albert Ellis, Ph.D. https://albertellis.org/about-albert-ellis-phd/
Albert Ellis Institute. (n.d.-b). REBT in the context of modern psychological research. https://albertellis.org/rebt-in-the-context-of-modern-psychological-research/
Ellis, A. (1958). Rational psychotherapy. The Journal of General Psychology, 59(1), 35–49. Read the original paper.

